StatQuestions traces the customer journey from pre-sale to billing — across email, voice, and public reviews — surfacing exactly where friction spikes and which trends are statistically real.
American Bath Group set out to scale customer interactions across a portfolio of brands - converging email, voice, and public reviews with statistical significance, then layering the findings with manufacturing expertise.
Here is how they unified three fragmented channels into one tested, defensible view.
Most feedback tools tally keywords and call a rise a trend. But a jump from 5 mentions to 7 can be pure chance. StatQuestions tests whether a change is statistically real before you spend a dollar chasing it, then shows you the confidence and the caveats side by side.
A hybrid pipeline reads every message and files it into one canonical taxonomy, so the same issue lands in the same place every time.
One agreed structure of issues and sub-issues, enforced at the database layer so it never drifts.
Regex for the obvious, a trained classifier for the rest, and an LLM only where it earns its place.
First-pass confidence moved from 28% to 52% as the taxonomy tightened. The number is on the screen, not hidden.
One angry customer who emails, calls, and posts is one problem, not three. StatQuestions collapses duplicates into a single canonical record and keeps count of how many collapsed in.
Near-identical messages merge into one record with a stable identity you can track over time.
Every merge carries a count, so volume stays honest and nothing gets silently dropped.
Report the real number of distinct issues, not an inflated tally of restated duplicates.
A control chart tells the difference between normal variation and a real shift. Every trend arrives with a test attached, so you know what deserves action.
χ² and p-values run on the movements that matter, so a spike is labeled real or random.
Control limits mark the band of normal variation. A point outside it is worth a meeting.
Sample size and limitations sit next to every finding, so the claim is only as strong as the data.
A complaint in an inbox, on a call, and in a public review is the same complaint. StatQuestions scores all three on one comparable scale so you can rank them together.
Every channel scores 0 to 100 on the same Handle scale, so the numbers actually line up.
Calls are transcribed and scored on the same rubric, not stranded in a separate tool.
What shows up in the open counts too, weighted alongside private channels.
Six connected modules over the same tested, deduplicated corpus.
Root-cause view across brands and business units, with significance on every trend.
Control charts and χ² tests that separate a real shift from normal variation.
Find the duplicated, misrouted, and low-value work hiding inside the queue.
Classify and score the full inbox corpus, confidence shown on every record.
Calls transcribed and scored on the same Handle scale as email and public.
Turn a tested finding into a ranked, owned next step, not another chart.
Statistical rigor applied to employee experience. Eight dimensions, scored and triangulated.
Your customers' words are sensitive. StatQuestions handles them with encryption, tight access control, and careful PII treatment.
Field notes on statistical rigor for customer feedback, written for the people who have to act on it.
Read the blogSample size, significance, and the multiple-comparisons trap, in plain terms for feedback teams.
Bring a slice of your feedback. We will show you which trends are real and which are noise, on the same call.